Lompat ke konten Lompat ke sidebar Lompat ke footer
Beranda / napoleon's policy called the continental system was created to

napoleon's policy called the continental system was created to

Posting Komentar

1806–1814 embargo of Napoleonic European Economic Community against United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irelan

The Continental Blockade (French: Blocus geographic area), or Continent-wide System, was the naturalized insurance policy of Napoleon Bonaparte against the Tied Land during the Napoleonic Wars. Eastern Samoa a response to the service blockade of the French coasts enacted by the British governance along 16 May 1806, Little Corpora issued the Berlin Order on 21 November 1806, which brought into effect a large-plate trade embargo against British trade.[1] [2] The embargo was applied intermittently, close on 11 April 1814 after Napoleon's start abdication. The blockade caused teensy-weensy economic damage to the UK, although British exports to the continent (as a proportion of the UK's total trade) dropped from 55% to 25% 'tween 1802 and 1806.[3] As Napoleon realized that extensive trade was sledding through Spain and Russia, he invaded those two countries. His forces were tied down in Spain—in which the European country War of Independence was occurring simultaneously—and suffered hard in, and ultimately retreated from, Russia in 1812.

The Berlin Decree forbade the import of British goods into some European countries allied with or dependent upon Jacques Anatole Francois Thibault, and it installed the Continental System in Europe. All connections with UK were to be sliced, even the get off. British merchants smuggled in some goods and the Continental System was not a powerful weapon of scheme warfare.[4] There was some damage to British trade, especially in 1808 and 1812, but British control of the oceans LED to replacement trade in with Northwesterly and South America, As well as magnanimous scale smuggling in European Community. The loss of Britain as a trading married person besides hit the economies of France and its allies.[5] Angry governments gained an bonus to ignore the Continental System, which led to the weakening of Little Corpora's coalition.[6]

Background knowledge [edit]

With child Britain was the central important force in encouraging and funding alliances against Napoleonic France. Napoleon was frustrated in his repeated attempts to defeat Britain. Attacks that involved service world power had all failed, with the systematic defeats of the combined French and Spanish navies. Later the decisive defeat at Trafalgar, Napoleon made no attempt to rebuild his Navy. He inverted rather to economic warfare, planning to deflower the British economy. It was thought that Britain depended altogether upon trade with Europe for its successfulness, so newspaper clipping off deal out with continental Europe would ruin the British economy and force IT to sue for peace. A obstruct was impossible because the Royal Navy controlled the seas, but if Napoleon restrained the ports of Europe, atomic number 2 could prevent British products from landing.[7]

The Crowned Navy obligatory a armed service blockade of the European country and French-allied coasts, on 16 May 1806. Napoleon resorted rather to economic warfare. Britain was Europe's manufacturing and business enterprise center as a result of the Industrial Revolution. Napoleon believed it would be easy to take advantage of an embargo on craft with the European nations under his command, causing inflation and great debt to undermine the British strength. His position was reinforced past the Spill of Berlin in October 1806, bringing swathes of Prussia below his control.

In November 1806, having recently conquered surgery allied with all major power on the European continent, Napoleon, in retaliation to the British Order-in-Council of 17 May 1806 blockading all ports from Brest to the Elbe, issued the Berlin Decree forbiddance his allies and conquests from trading with the British.[8] Britain responded with further Orders in Council issued happening 10 January and 11 November 1807.[9] These forbade French trade with Britain, its allies or neutrals, and instructed the House US Navy to blockade all French and allied ports, and to preclude all shipping whether neutral or non. Napoleon responded once more with the Milan Decree of 1807, declaring that all neutral shipping using Island ports or profitable British tariffs were to be regarded as British and seized.

Napoleon's plan to vote down United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Irelan was to demolish its ability to trade. As an island nation, trade was its most animated lifeline. Napoleon believed that if he could isolate Britain economically, he would be able to intrude on the nation afterwards its economic collapse. Napoleon decreed that all commercialized ships wishing to do business in Europe must first stop at a French port in ordinate to ensure that there could embody no trade with Britain. He also ordered all European nations and French allies to lay of trading with United Kingdom, and helium threatened Soviet Russia with an intrusion if they did not comply as comfortably. His orders backfired in the Iberian Peninsula, peculiarly in Portugal (beingness confederative to Britain), setting slay the Peninsular War. He pushed Russia excessively hard, some in damage of the Continental System, and in his demands for control over part of Poland. Napoleon I's unsuccessful 1812 encroachment of Russia was a disaster[10] which set the stage for his downfall.

Effects [edit]

Great Britain [edit]

The System had mixed effects happening British people trade. The embargo encouraged British merchants to seek out new markets aggressively and to engage in smuggling with continental Europe. Napoleon's exclusively land-based customs enforcers could not stop British people smugglers, especially as these operated with the connivance of Napoleon's chosen rulers of Spain, Westphalia and other German states.[11] [12] British exports to the Continent fell between 25% to 55% compared to pre-1806 levels. However, trade sharply increased with the rest of the mankind, covering often of the decline.[13] [14]

Britain, by Orders in Council, prohibited other countries (that is, its merchandise partners) from trading with France. The British countered the Continental system by threatening to sink any ship that did non total to a Island interface or chose to comply with France. This forked threat created a difficult time for neutral nations like the United States. In response to this prohibition, the United States government adopted the Trade stoppage Act of 1807 and eventually Macon's Bill No. 2. This embargo was designed as an economic counterattack to suffering Britain, but it proved even more damaging to Earth merchants. In collaboration with the issues of the impressment of foreign seamen, and British support for Indian raids in the American Dame Rebecca West, tensions led to a declaration of war by the U.S. in the State of war of 1812. This war, not Nap's blockade, sharply reduced British trade with the United States.[15]

The British economy suffered greatly in 1810 to 1812, especially in terms of high unemployment and inflation. This led to widespread objection and violence, but the middle classes and superior classes powerfully pendent the government, which used the army to suppress the working family unrest, especially the Luddite movement.[16] [17]

France and Transcontinental Europe [edit]

The episode seriously suffer France itself. Shipbuilding, and its trades such as rope-making, declined, as did many other industries that relied happening overseas markets, such as the linen paper industries. With few exports and lost win, umteen industries were unsympathetic down. Confederate France, specially the larboard cities of Marseille and Bordeaux, too as the city of Lanthanum Rochelle, suffered from the reducing in sell. Moreover, the prices of staple foods rose in virtually of continent-wide Europe.[18]

Napoleon's St. Mist Decree in July 1810 opened the southwest of France and the Spanish people frontier to limited British business deal, and reopened French business deal to the United States. IT was an admission that his blockade had hurt his own economy more than the British. It had also failed to reduce British financial backin for its Allies.[19] The industrialized north and east of France, and Wallonia (the south of today's Belgium) saw importantly increased winnings due to the lack of competition from British goods (peculiarly textiles, which were produced much more tattily in Britain).

In Italy, the agricultural sector flourished;[20] but the Dutch economy, predicated on trade, suffered greatly as a answer of the embargo. Napoleon's profitable war was much to the chagrin of his own brother, King Louis I of Holland.

Scandinavia and the Baltic region [edit]

Frailty-Admiral James Saumarez was the commander of the Royal Navy in the Geographic region campaign of 1808–1814 that secured British trade to the region.

Britain's get-go response to the Continental system of rules was to launch a senior naval attack on the weakest link up in Napoleon's coalition, Danmark. Although apparently neutral, Denmark was nether heavy French and Russian pressure to pledge its fade to Napoleon Bonaparte. London could not return the chance of ignoring the Danish threat. In the Second Battle of Danish capital in August–September 1807, the Imperial United States Navy bombarded Copenhagen, seized the Scandinavian nation fleet, and secure control of the ocean lanes north Sea and Baltic Seagoing for the Island merchant flutter.[21] [22] The island of Heligoland remove the West Coast of Denmark was engaged in September 1807. This base made information technology easier for Britain to control trade to Northerly Sea ports and to facilitate smuggling. The attacks against Copenhagen and Heligoland started the Gunboat War against Denmark, which lasted until 1814.

Kingdom of Sweden, Britain's friend in the Third Alignment, refused to comply with European nation demands and was attacked by Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in February and by Denmark/Norway in March 1808. At the same time, a French ram threatened to invade southern Sweden, but the contrive was stopped as the Royal Nav controlled the Danish straits. The Royal Navy frame a base outside the port of Gothenburg in 1808 to simplify operations into the Baltic Sea. The Baltic campaign was under the command of full admiral James Saumarez. In November 1810 France demanded that Sverige should declare warfare upon Great Britain and stop all trade. The outcome was a phoney war between Sweden and Britain. A second United States Navy base was set up happening the island of Hanö south of Sweden in 1810. These cardinal bases were used to support convoys from Britain to Gothenburg, then through the Danish straits to Hanö. From Hanö the goods were smuggled to the many ports around the Baltic Deep-sea. To further support the convoys, the small Scandinavian nation island of Anholt was occupied in May 1809. A beacon happening the island simplified navigation through the Danish straits.

Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic besides chafed under the embargo, and in 1810 reopened trade with Britain. Russia's withdrawal from the system was a motivating factor behind Napoleon's decision to invade Russia in 1812, which well-tried the turn point of the war and his regime.

Portugal and Espana [edit]

Portugal openly refused to join the Continental System. In 1793, Portugal signed a treaty of mutual assistance with Britain.[23] After the Treaty of Tilsit of July 1807, Napoleon unsuccessful to charm the Portuguese Fleet and the Planetary hous of Braganza, and to occupy the Portuguese ports. Atomic number 2 failing, as Queen Maria I of Portuguese Republic took her fleet and transferred the Portuguese court to Brazil with a Royal United States Navy bodyguard. The Portuguese population rose in revolt against the French invaders, with the serve of the British Army under Arthur Wellesley, later the Duke of Wellington. Napoleon intervened, and the Peninsular War began in 1808. Napoleon too forced the European country royal stag family to abdicate their throne in favor Napoleon's brother, Joseph.

References [redact]

  1. ^ David Stephen Heidler; Jteanne T. Heidler (2004). Encyclopedia of the War of 1812. Military service Institute Press. p. 48. ISBN978-1-59114-362-8.
  2. ^ Jean Tulard, Napoléon, Hachette, 2008, p. 207
  3. ^ Alfred Fierro; André Palluel-Guillard; Jean Tulard (1995). Histoire et dictionnaire du Consulat et de l'Empire. Robert Laffont. ISBN2-221-05858-5.
  4. ^ Paul W. Schroeder, The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1858 (1999) pp. 305–10
  5. ^ Horse parsley Grab, Napoleon and the Transformation of Europe (2003) pp. 29–33
  6. ^ François Crouzet, "Wars, blockade, and economic alter in Europe, 1792–1815." Journal of Economical Chronicle (1964) 24#4 pp. 567–88 JSTOR 2115762.
  7. ^ Louis R. Gottschalk, The Era of the French Gyration. (1715–1815) (1929) p. 373.
  8. ^ "Documents upon the ContinentaI System 1806". www.napoleon-serial publication.org.
  9. ^ Holberg, Tom. The Acts, Orders in Council, &c. of UK (on Trade), 1793–1812
  10. ^ Society, National Geographic (2020-04-06). "Bonaparte Invades Soviet Russia". National Geographic Society . Retrieved 2021-08-19 .
  11. ^ On smuggling see Roger Knight, Britain against Napoleon (2013) pp. 402–03.[ ISBN missing ]
  12. ^ Gavin Daly, "Little Corpora and the 'Urban center of Smugglers', 1810–1814." Historical Journal 50.2 (2007): 333–52.
  13. ^ J.M. Thompson,Napoleon Bonaparte: His rise and fall (1951) pp. 235–40
  14. ^ François Crouzet, "A serious cause of social and economic dislocation," Frank Kafter and Jesse James Laux, eds., Napoleon Bonaparte and his times (1989) pp. 179–92.[ ISBN missing ]
  15. ^ Dub, U.K. against Little Corpora (2013) pp. 433–36.
  16. ^ Knight, pp. 410–12.
  17. ^ Francois Crouzet, Britain Ascendant (1990) pp. 277–79.
  18. ^ Eli Heckscher, The continental system: an economic rendition (1922) pp. 266–94.
  19. ^ Eric A. Arnold, Jr. "Napoleon's St. Cloud Rule out, 3 July 1810: Text and Analysis," Proceeding of the Western Society for French History (1998), Vol. 25, pp. 49–54
  20. ^ Alexander Grab and Charles F. Delzell, "The Kingdom of Italy and Napoleon's Continental Barricade," Consortium on Revolutionary Europe 1750–1850: Minutes (1988), Vol. 18, pp. 587–604.
  21. ^ A. N. Ryan, "The Causes of the British Flak upon Copenhagen in 1807." English language Real Review (1953): 37–55. in JSTOR
  22. ^ Thomas Munch-Petersen, Defying Napoleon: How U.K. Bombarded Copenhagen and Taken over the Danish Fleet in 1807 (2007)
  23. ^ Portugal; José Ferreira Borges de Castro (Visconde Diamond State); Julio Firmino Judice Biker (1857). Supplemeto á Collecção dos tratados, convenções, contratos e actos publicos celebrados entre a corôa de Portugal e American Samoa mais potencias desde 1640. Imprensa nacional. Portugal. Ministério dos Negócios Estrangeiros. pp. 19–25.

Foster interpretation [edit]

  • Aaslestad, Katherine B., and Johan Joor, eds. Revisiting Napoleon Bonaparte's Continental System: Local anesthetic, Regional and European Experiences (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014). Varied essays by experts excerpt
  • Breunig, Charles. The Get on of Revolution and Reaction 1789–1850 (1970), Chapter 2[ ISBN missing ]
  • Broers, Michael. Europe Subordinate Napoleon (IB Tauris, 2014).[ ISBN nonexistent ]
  • Crouzet, François. "Wars, barricade, and economic change in Europe, 1792–1815." Daybook of Profitable History 24#4 (1964): 567–88. in JSTOR
  • Godechot, Jacques, et al. The Napoleonic era in Europe (1971) pp. 126–39, 156–59.[ ISBN missing ]
  • Gottschalk, Louis R. The Era of the French Revolution. (1715–1815) (1929) pp. 373–99. online
  • Heckscher, Eli. The Continental organisation: an economic interpretation (1922), the only orbicular survey of the Continental System; online
  • Knight, Roger. Britain against Napoleon (2013) pp. 386–416.[ ISBN missing ]
  • Mowat, R. B. The Diplomacy of Napoleon Bonaparte (1924) pp. 190–206 online
  • O'Rourke, Kevin H. "War and welfare: Britain, France, and the United States 1807–14." Oxford Economic Papers 59.suppl 1 (2007): i8–i30, uses econometrics to argue GB fared better than either France operating theater the United States.
  • Rose, J. H. "Napoleon and English Commerce." English Historical Refresh 8#32 (1893): 704–25. online.
  • Ruppenthal, Roland. "Denmark and the Continental Organization." Daybook of Modern History 15.1 (1943): 7–23. in JSTOR
  • Sloane, William M."The Continental System of Napoleon I" Political Science Quarterly (1898) 12#2 213–31.online

External links [edit]

  • "Documents upon the Continental System", from napoleon-serial.org

napoleon's policy called the continental system was created to

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_System

Posting Komentar untuk "napoleon's policy called the continental system was created to"